Mar. 12th, 2004

ravencallscrows: (mountaingoat)
Excerpt courtesy of Paul Vitello of Newsday:

Paul Vitello: A president's brand of optimism
March 12, 2004

It was upbeat, precise, as organized as a meeting of the board of directors, framed at beginning and end with rousing music - a near-perfect campaign stop:

President George W. Bush arrived on schedule. He gave his speech. He moderated a panel of five people on a makeshift stage in front of a sign that said "Strengthening America's Economy." He wove their stories seamlessly into the fabric of his re-election campaign. He engaged in self-deprecating humor that even a detractor might find charming.

And then he left - to a standing ovation - shaking hands all the way to the exit door of U.S.A. Industries in Bay Shore, where his campaign made this first of three stops on Long Island yesterday.

Security people kept reporters from interviewing the workers at U.S.A. until the president was gone.

But when workers were finally interviewed - these people who made up the bulk of the president's cheering audience in New York - Bush's performance turned out to be even more impressive.

"No speak English," said the first worker, smiling apologetically.

"No speak English," said the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth workers waylaid in the crowd.

It is possible that President Bush could have drawn a crowd of several hundred at lunchtime on the streets of Bay Shore to cheer his economic policies, which can be summed up in two words: tax cuts.

But if that crowd is ready-made - the workforce of a small auto parts factory whose owner has received tax breaks from the Republican-run state and town governments, and who employs large numbers of non-English speaking immigrants happy to work for $6 to $9 an hour with few benefits - why bother?

"I understand him a little bit English," said Nubia Guzman, a packer who said she earns $7.50 an hour after four years on a job that Bush had described in his speech as evidence of the success of his tax cutting economic policies. She has no health coverage.

What did you like about him? she was asked.

"He nice," she said.

This may be all that matters in the long run. The candidate who wins is usually the one people like the look and sound of, not the one they have listened closely to. In this particular crowd, anyway, there were probably few voters. Of those who spoke English, few said they were registered.

Does it matter to anyone but a literal-minded person that the "crowd" at a campaign stop is not quite "real"?

It is the not-so-secret secret of every presidential campaign that most crowds at most campaign stops are so much stage prop. They are there to make a certain amount of noise, to look like a constituency the candidate hopes to win the votes of - in the Bay Shore factory, Hispanic voters - and to be as unsurprising and well-behaved as security arrangements can make them.


Wow. This takes Potemkinizing to an all new high- all six of the people interviewed right after Mr. Chimpy left pretty much didn't understand a word of what he said. Now we understand why they didn't let anyone talk to them before he left- it would have been one more demonstration that the Emperor has no clothes.

He's a crooked liar (yes, this is part of a new Googlebomb, so make sure if you use the phrase "crooked liar" anywhere in your blog you link it to the page which is linked here [Mr. Chimpy's official bio, on whitehouse.gov]. After all, look what it did for Santorum).

2nd November, 2004. The End of an Error.
ravencallscrows: (mountaingoat)
Yes, boys and girls, the crooked liar is at it again. It's the Reagan-era StarWars Strategic Defense Initiative redux:
September 11, 2001 underscored that our Nation faces unprecedented threats, in a world that has changed greatly since the Cold War. To better protect our country against the threats of today and tomorrow, my Administration has developed a new national security strategy, and new supporting strategies for making our homeland more secure and for combating weapons of mass destruction. ...

I have directed the Secretary of Defense to proceed with fielding an initial set of missile defense capabilities. We plan to begin operating these initial capabilities in 2004 and 2005, and they will include ground-based interceptors, sea-based interceptors, additional Patriot (PAC-3) units, and sensors based on land, at sea, and in space.

This quote from the crooked liar on 17 December, 2002. Yesterday, the Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing and interviewed several scientists, military and civilian personnel involved in the programme. Here are two exercpts from the proceedings:
Senator Carl Levin: "Is there any relationship between the fact that the president made a decision to deploy in December of 2002, and shortly thereafter you decided to cancel all these tests?"

Lt. Gen. Ronald T. Kadish, Missile Defense Agency director: "Senator, we didn't cancel those tests, we reoriented, and rescheduled them, put their objectives in different pots." …

Lisbeth Gronlund of the Union of Concerned Scientists: "Every other piece of the time line has slipped. The one thing that has remained constant is the deployment date. That's completely political."

---

Senator Jack Reed: "So at this time, we cannot be sure that the actual system would work against a real North Korean missile threat?"

Thomas P.Christie, the Pentagon's director of Operational Test and Evaluation: "I would say that's true."

Philip E. Coyle, Christie’s predecessor: "Ever since the president made his decision, the priority of the program has been on deployment, not on understanding whether the system works."

Given that nations which possess ballistic missiles with sufficient range to reach the U.S. are pretty limited, and of those, only North Korea is a realistic possible hostile nation- assuming that their weapons have that range, which is far from being a given, (China and Russia both need the trade, even if relations were considerably strained, and thus can pretty fairly be disqualified) the threat to this nation from such missiles is pretty damned limited.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) asses a more likely threat:
"The only thing holding back a terrorist detonating a nuclear bomb in the US is the lack of weapons-grade uranium or plutonium needed to make a nuclear device operational. The second they get that capability, they will have no difficulty smuggling that bomb into a US harbor. Fortunately, there are ways to keep this nightmare from becoming a reality.”


Here's where things get really duplicitous:
FY 2005 Budget Request for Missile Defense: $10200 million

FY 2005 Budget Request for Port Security grants: $46 million

Yes, you read that correctly. Over two hundred and twenty times more money is budgeted in Fiscal Year 2005 for a missile-defense system which hasn't been tested and which we have no reasonable reason to think would work, than is allocated to defend our ports, which are significantly more likely to be a point of entry for a weapon of mass destruction. Just for perspective, the administration is funding the National Endowment for the Arts (and we know how evil Republicans think the NEA is) to the tune of $139.4 million- just over three times the funding for port security.

And this administration is campaigning for re-election claiming that they're the ones strong on defense and national security? Would whoever flipped the switch to put us into bizarro world please put it back?
ravencallscrows: (flutterby)
*sigh*
It must be something about my cooking that scares people off, whether intentionally or subconsciously. Granted, it's not Riccardo di Francischiello in Massa Lubrense, or La Cantinella on the Via Nazario Sauro in Napoli; but it's not Ragu-inna-can either. Yet almost without fail, when we have guests invited for dinner, something happens and our guests fail to show.

Or maybe they get a phone call from an intimidating-sounding Italian who says "Che cosa può un americano dell'eredità russa, ebrea e di scotti conoscere circa la cottura dell'italiano? Dovreste essere pazzeschi andare, capite?"

Whatever it is, it's disappointing.

[livejournal.com profile] ithilien and [livejournal.com profile] gwynn_aaron, if you two don't make it, i'm not coming to help you unload :-p

Profile

ravencallscrows: (Default)
Vanya Y Tucherov

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415 161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 16th, 2025 09:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios