Apparently, last night, during a political rally in Austin, Texas, the Hillary Clinton campaign set up a filing centre for the traveling press corps. In and of itself, that wouldn't be particularly newsworthy.

It's where they set it up for this particular event that's notable. Out of all the places they could have found to put the reporters, they put them in the men's room at the site.

I, uh, shit you not. Here's a picture from one of the reporter's mobile phone:

Mind you, they didn't take the mens' room out of commission while they had the press in there- there are reports of attendees stumbling in and lookng very confused. There was also no separation of gender- both male and female reporters alike were sequestered in the can.

There are all sorts of puns which spring to mind which could be used in relation to this, but aside from the one two 'graphs up, I'm going to try to avoid them.

Well, past saying that if the campaign is trying to piss off reporters, this is a way of doing so which probably takes the [urinal] cake.
Now that USAdian politics has wound down for a bit, we can speculate about Canadian goings-on. With the Liberals picking francophone Quebeçois Stéphane Dion hard on the heels of PM Harper announcing that la belle provence amounts to a nation within a nation, will this precipitate new elections, or will it put them off to see if the new Grit leader missteps right out of the box. It doesn't look as if the NDP is going to waste any time picking on Dion- making initial attempts to tie him to the Martin scandals and a series of votes on which Dion came down on the 'wrong' side or missed. I think this is a bad tack unless the current government is about to fall- in which case it may be the opening salvos of a campaign. Either way, i'd rather see the New Democrats spend their efforts pushing for national recognition of their Working Families First plan- better healthcare, cleaner environment, enhanced economic security, election reform and ensuring equal treatment of some of the First Nations which have gone badly neglected historically.

Since the NDP isn't likely to win enough seats to form a government, much less a majority, any time soon, attacking the opposition party doesn't seem to make any sense at all, especially since they're better ideological bed-fellows for the Liberals than for the Tories- it's that whole 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' concept, but especially since the Conservatives take most stands on the opposite end of the spectrum rather than the more centrist Liberal positions.

Getting out in a bit- meeting new acquaintance A. for tea. Attempting to be more social if it kills me. So far, it hasn't.
Filleann an feall ar an bhfeallaire.

The treachery returns to the betrayer.

It's interesting to hear the Republicans saying "Count every vote" now. Funny that they didn't think it needed to happen in 2000. For the time being, though, it's Senator-elect Jim Webb in Virginia until evidence to the contrary is presented, and the US Senate is 49 Republicans, 49 Democrats, 1 Independent who self-describes as a Democratic Socialist (Bernie Sanders in Vermont)— which i think qualifies him as fairly equivalent to Canada's NDP, and the Senator from the Connecticut for Lieberman party. Both of the non-aligned members have caucused with the Democrats.

Now for the press- could one of the New England liberal Republicans- the recently re-elected Olympia Snowe of Maine or her junior Senatorial counterpart Susan Collins or New Hampshire's Judd Gregg be enticed to switch? Collins is probably the most likely- she's currently the most liberal Republican (as per the National Journal and her voting record is to the left of Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska. Could make for interesting machinations.
While on the way back home with [ profile] damashita and the boys after taking them out trick-or-treating, we heard a report on NPR which featured a scientist who was doing behavioural research at Emory University, which prompted all sorts of thoughts. If matters had worked out as far as financial aid and the like were concerned, after finishing my B.A. in English and History in 1988 from the University of Richmond, i'd have entered a masters programme at Emory doing a concentration in the U.S. Civil War-related studies.

Since one of the only things as singularly as unsalable in the job market as a B.A. in English and History is a M.A. in History, i'd probably have ended up doing a Ph.D. and subsequently gotten into the academic rat race of teaching and publishing. By now, i'd probably have written the definitive histories of the Stonewall Brigade (CSA, Army of Northern Virginia), the Richmond Grays (CSA, ANV- and one of the units with the highest concentration of Jewish soldiers in the war), and the Iron Brigade (USA, primarily Army of the Potomac until June 1865, Army of Tennessee afterwards); and probably a few cross-field studies on the evolution of tactics which saw the American Civil War make the transition from Napoleonic warfare to modern war; and who knows what other monographs.

I'd probably have avoided the disaster that my relationship with my rabidly fundamentalist ex-wife became; but probably never have migrated to the Pacific Northwest and hooked up with [ profile] damashita. Life would be drastically different. I somehow doubt that it'd be better, especially since my historical interests have shifted significantly since then. Not to mention having a stable, loving relationship and a couple o' great kids in the mix.

And now for something completely different...

A week from today, the US has an election. Looking at advance polling, it is completely possible that the US Senate could be evenly divided. Currently, with seats not up for election this cycle and those in areas where polling shows one candidate to have an advantage of over ten percent over the other, representation would be 43 Democrats and 47 Republicans. Independent Bernie Sanders is listed on the Democratic line in the Vermont Senate race, and caucuses with the Democrats. The Connecticut Senate race is functionally between the incumbent, Joe Lieberman, running as an Independent although he has said he'd continue to caucus with the Democrats; and Democratic nominee Ned Lamont, who beat Lieberman in the Democratic primary. Maryland's race to replace the retiring Democrat Paul Sarbanes has Democrat Ben Cardin polling fairly reliably significantly above Republican challenger Michael Steele- but not quite the ten percent which could be said to make it a lock. This leaves five races: New Jersey, Montana, and Virginia- all showing polling favouring the Democratic candidates; Tennessee and Missouri- which have had poll results fluctuating wildly and always within the margins of error over the last month or so.

Assuming Lieberman is good to his word and remains functionally a Democrat and Sanders continues to caucus with the Democrats, it is completely possible that the chamber could be divided 50-50— which, with as partisan as matters are these days would potentially place the Vice-President regularly in the position of casting the tie-breaking vote.

U.S. history shows few such cases where the VP could concievably be called upon to regularly function as the tie-breaker. The 72nd Congress (1930-1932) was composed of 48 Republicans, 47 Democrats, and one senator from the Farmer-Labor party- but legal concerns kept the body from admitting one elected Republican member, who was replaced with a Democrat in a special election; and the death of another Republican member led to the change of that seat- making the body functionally 46R/49D/1 F-L. Similarly, the 1952 elections saw the division in the 83rd Congress 48 Republicans, 47 Democrats and 1 Independent- and saw three special elections resulting from deaths, resulting in one seat shifting to the Democrats. It's not clear with a cursory amount of research how the Independent voted. This change would continue through the 84th Congress- 48 Democrats, 47 Republicans, 1 Independent. The 107th Congress (2000-2002) was 50-50, but from 3 January (when the Senate was seated) until 20 January (the inauguration of the President and Vice-President), functionally 51-50 with the vote of then Vice-President Gore. Vermont Senator Jim Jeffords left the Republican party to become an Independent caucusing with the Democrats, but was still elected as a Republican- depriving Cheney of many cases to break party-line ties.

This year, things could be drastically different. 48D-50R-2I and 49D-50R-1I are concievable, if not likely- so, for the first time, we may see a significant number of 50-51 party line votes. Tuesday evening will amount to "interesting times."


Vanya Y Tucherov

December 2016

18192021 222324


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 21st, 2017 01:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios